24
Jan 2003
CONGESTION CHARGING - THE BIKING SCARE FACTOR
The British Motorcyclists Federation, Britain's biggest
biker group, has accused Mayor Ken Livingston's safety
pundits of a scare campaign in the face of the increased
use of congestion charge beating motorcycles and scooters.
The 140,000 strong BMF, Britain's most influential rider
group, are concerned that the shock tactics applied
to a current cinema advertising campaign funded by Transport
for London (TfL) are designed more to deter people from
taking up PTWs (powered two wheelers) than it is to
reduce accidents.
The advertising campaign, costing a reputed £1.2
million, uses live actors within the audience to dramatise
the report of a crash involving a motorcycle and then
shows a short film of a car/motorcycle collision. It
does nothing positive to educate drivers or riders say
the BMF, it simply records the incident and dramatises
it.
The BMF are also critical of the casualty figures used
to justify the cinema campaign. Figures quoting a 111%
increase in PTW deaths since 1995 (25 to 52) are totally
misleading say the BMF as they completely ignore the
fact that usage has increased massively over that same
period. Registration figures for London show that moped
registrations alone increasing by over one thousand
percent (1007%) from a1995 level of 668 to a level of
7,397 in 2000.
The BMF see this blatant manipulation of figures designed
to scare off potential new riders. Such a massive increase
in usage has to be taken into account when quoting casualty
figures. Not to do so is a gross misrepresentation of
the facts say the BMF.
The BMF have been encouraged by what was seen as an
enlightened view by TfL of the contribution PTWs can
make in reducing congestion, (with the wider use of
bus lanes by PTWs being a case in point), but now suspect
exemptions were agreed more for practical administrative
reasons than anything else.
'We are deeply concerned that personalities within TfL's
road safety division are using the introduction of congestion
charging to pursue an anti motorcycling agenda"
said the BMF's Assistant Government Relations Executive,
Richard Olliffe.
"The cinema campaign purports to be aimed at reducing
junction crashes yet seems to be saying that it is up
to motorcyclists and scooter riders to avoid such crashes.
By TfL's own admission, in the majority of junction
crashes, the motorcyclist or scooter rider is the innocent
victim of incompetent car driving therefore the campaign
should be aimed at the motorist, not the motorcyclist"
he said.
Summing up, Richard said: "The BMF believes that
road safety practitioners should deliver road safety
regimes that protect vulnerable road user groups like
motorcyclists and scooters riders. This campaign begs
the question; is the TfL road safety division capable
of delivering safer roads for London's growing number
of motorcycle and scooter users? If this exercise is
anything to go by, I don't think so!"
Issued by Jeff Stone:
t: 0121 709 1040 f: 0121 705 8784
e: jeff.stone@bmf.co.uk
Details on this and other BMF activities can also be
found on our web site: http://www.bmf.co.uk
|